CLIENT PSYCHOLOGY & FAMILY LAWYERS
Clients in family law, which covers divorce, child custody, child support, alimony, and property distribution, are typically decent people going through the most difficult times in their lives. In addition to losing their spouse, they are also losing their definition of what it means to be a “family”—possibly spending less time with their kids, losing some of their possessions, and losing some of the income that allowed them to maintain their quality of life. There are a lot of adjustments to be made in such a small amount of time. People frequently experience a variety of emotions during times of change, including worry, melancholy, and rage. If you need any help about family lawyers, you can visit ExLibro.
Even worse situations arise when people view these modifications as “ego threats,” treating their failing marriage as a psychological rather than a behavioral failure. Instead of telling themselves, “I’ve made some stupid judgments,” they tell themselves, “I’m a failure.” Therefore, divorce attorneys who “just” concentrate on the legal concerns are leaving too many matters open and unaddressed.
Additionally, whenever parties to a divorce case argue over child custody, the judge will often retain a forensic psychologist to conduct an evaluation and inform the court of each party’s psychiatric problems and their respective parenting and coparenting skills. I’m not only more familiar with the psychological testing procedure than most lawyers, but I’ve also conducted these tests myself in the past. As a result, I’m in an excellent position to explain the procedure to my clients, help them practice their skills for psychological interviews, and steer clear of many of the common mistakes that custody litigants make.
My clients are prepared for their custody evaluations by knowing what to expect, what kinds of inquiries to expect, and how to best communicate their own, intimate tales in a way that the psychologist will grasp and incorporate into his or her analysis. I cannot teach any client how to “beat” or “win” a custody evaluation, however. The results of psychological tests and interviews are simply too accurate for that. What I’m trying to imply is that my clients approach the process with a more laid-back, upbeat attitude, which enables them to be the best versions of themselves.
What difference does it make if psychological factors, including mental health, are taken into account during family law proceedings?
To assist them in overcoming the different traumas and changes they are going through, I send each of my clients to a psychologist or therapist. Not all of my clients, but some do, do follow up on that recommendation. And those clients invariably complete the process on a much more level footing. Additionally, I frequently collaborate with the psychologist or therapist (with the necessary releases for the disclosure of otherwise private information) to ensure that we are each working with our respective clients in the most effective manner while also keeping each other informed of what is happening in the other’s office.
I feel like I am more effectively assisting my clients in moving on to a more fruitful, pleasurable phase of their lives when I can actively participate in their efforts to treat their mental health difficulties.
I can work with my clients to teach them problem-solving skills so they don’t become lost in the center of their difficulties without the ability to assist themselves get out, even if they decide not to consult a psychologist or therapist. I frequently use the analogy of falling into a muddy puddle to describe the divorce process.
The client has a decision to make: either they will get up, clean themselves up, and decide where they want to walk to next, or they will stay seated in the muddy puddle whining about their circumstances. Divorce offers people the chance to move on, if nothing else.
The family court system is already connected to the social sciences in a variety of ways. Every child custody dispute must first go through mediation with a professional mediator at the courthouse. The parties’ disagreements may be resolved through mediation, and it may also teach them how to collaborate as co-parents rather than as partners in order to prioritize the needs of their children.
Second, child custody litigants in Los Angeles and many other counties must also take a one-hour online course designed to teach the parties how to avoid involving their children in the case. Despite being a short, one-hour course, it contains a wealth of useful information.
Similar to what I’ve said before, courts are prepared and eager to accept advice from the psychologists who do forensic psychiatric exams.
Additionally, if the family law judge determines that the parties and their children will benefit, she or he may always order them to attend family therapy, co-parenting counseling, or individual treatment.